AMA Publishing Group: Ophthalmic Devices Topic Collection
//www.igerbera.com
en-us
Tue, 01 Nov 2022 00:00:00 GMT
Thu, 17 Nov 2022 11:46:41 GMT
Silverchair
jamams@jamanetwork.org
support@www.igerbera.com
-
选择人工晶状体的病人接受ing Bilateral Cataract Extraction—One Size Does Not Fit All
//www.igerbera.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/2796509
Tue, 01 Nov 2022 00:00:00 GMT
Standard pairwise meta-analysis compares 2 interventions at a time, for example, treatment A vs treatment B. By contrast, network meta-analysis (NMA) compares 3 or more interventions in a single analysis by combining direct evidence within studies and indirect evidence based on a common comparator across a network of studies. In addition to estimates of the relative effects between any pair of interventions in the network, treatment ranking is a very informative output of NMA. However, inappropriate interpretation and overinterpretation of ranking statistics can misinform clinical decision-making.
140
11
1053
1054
10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.3692
2796509
-
Visual Outcomes of Accommodative, Multifocal, Extended Depth-of-Focus, and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
//www.igerbera.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/2796506
Tue, 01 Nov 2022 00:00:00 GMT
This systematic review and network meta-analysis compares outcomes of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses frequently recommended in clinical practice.
140
11
1045
1053
10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.3667
2796506